AID 24/100 Explanation regarding this article:
This article is an evolving article. This means that it is updated until it is completed, but it is republished with each update (Even if unfinished).
For example, AID10/100 (will appear below the title) – refers to an Article in Development. 10/100 refers to a rough assessment of the progress of the article until completion. Once the article is complete, this index will disappear, and at the bottom of the article will appear an EOA that indicates End Of Article.
Dear reader, at any stage in the development of the article, you can comment or ask a question, or together. I will do my best to address Specific to each application, this will open a way for you to contribute to the development of the article
foreword:
Just before I begin the analysis of the game in question, I would like to inform you, dear reader, that you may experience the following:
First, some of the things you will read here will seem strange to you.
If they do not seem strange to you, then it will be strange in itself.
The reason for this is simple – you have never heard or seen or read or come across chess that resides in other dimensions. Throughout the twentieth century to this day, the great chess players have expressed themselves in sayings and quotes about chess in a way that could be understood to imply something. That in itself, does not mean that they were fully aware of the architecture of chess, because even then, they chose for their own reasons, not to engage in this field, or rather, not to explore it.
You see, most of them, if not all of the great chess players were inherently competitive. This fact, which seemingly has nothing wrong with it, limited them to one and only one dimension of chess. The practical chess, or "The Instrument." The nature of the competitive game, made them develop their mental skills in an admirable way, but left them very little energy, time and desire to invest in the other (deep) dimensions of chess, as well as developing their spiritual skills and all this assuming they were exposed to these dimensions.
Another reason you have never read anything about the dimensions of chess, is that it requires the writer, whether it is a serious chess player or a writer, most often it is a combination of both, to write things that will look strange, as I mentioned at the beginning of the article. Needless to say, this is the last thing that any of the appreciated competitive chess players as well as the chess editors and writers are interested in, and not just the really great players, but everyone who is on this competitive track – it basically means everyone. Dealing with such an issue for them at best will lead to their removal from the professional chess track and at worst they will be considered eccentric and pitiful.
To summarize this sub-topic which deals, among other things, with some of the greatest chess players, writers and editors and their interaction with deep insights on high-dimensional chess, it turns out that although they made statements and quotes about how they define or describe chess that implies they felt and were aware of existing chess In a depth that has not been explored until their time, or if you will, about deeper insights about chess, none of them, including writers and editors in the field of chess – dared to enter this complex field. Certainly, there may be other reasons than those I have listed here which are trivial and obvious. For example, I did not deal at all with the question of whether they had the spiritual skills necessary to engage in dimensional chess. To this question as well as to the question of the degree of development of their skills, and depending on whether they felt these dimensions of chess or not.
Unfortunately, we will not be able to know the answers.
In this context, it must be said that it is quite possible that even the best chess player in the world will have limited spiritual skills, if not to say degenerate. While this is true for him it is true for all the great chess players, and in general, for every chess player. In other words, the level or quality of a chess player in the physical, basic, or "instrument" dimension of chess – has almost no effect on whether he will be able to sense the hidden dimensions of chess and his ability to explore them.
For those of you, the readers, who like to stay with points for thought after a good movie or book, and I am among them, here are 2 points for reflection and thought: If you google, you will find that some of the greatest chess players have expressed the quote "Chess is life". This saying is very demanding and charged. They actually claim that chess, great, complicated and beautiful as it may be, is not just a game and not just an achievement of culture, art or sport.
Jjj
Huჴ♟♞♝♜♛♚♙♘♗♖♕♔uu
RQPNLK
RQPNLK
RQPNLK
RQPNLK
♘♗♖♕♔♘♙♗♖♕RPNLKK